I just read an article about a guy on Galveston Island who got into some legal trouble for shooting a cat. The thing is that the guy, Jim Stevenson, is a naturalist and bird expert. Stevenson, who was charged with animal cruelty by a Galveston County grand jury, is the founding member of the Galveston Ornithological Society and insists that the cat he shot belongs to a feral cat colony that threatens the Island's bird population. And what makes matters worse is that Galveston Island is a natural stopover on an active bird migration route that crosses the United States. Some of Stevenson's neighbors and friends see him as a "respecter of nature," but others think otherwise, especially the "owner" of the cat involved in this case, John Newland. Right now there's a lot of legal wrangling going on regarding whether or not Stevenson broke any state laws.
I consider myself a animal lover and have owned several pets at various times in my life, so I feel for both sides of this case, but are these feral cats a natural part of the local environs? Probably not. Do these cats pose a threat to the birds in this area? Stevenson's actions deem it so. Unfortunately, people who "care" for these animals only exascerbate the problems associated with feral animals. And if one person decides to "care" for these animals, he or she should think about keeping these "pets" indoors, capture them in order to have them spayed or neutered, or have them moved to another location for de-feralizing, so as not to endanger the naturally occurring animals and their habitats of a given locale.
Perhaps it's not Mr. Stevenson's responsibility to take on this polemic endeavor to make the ferals cats go away, but those who care for these feral cats in some way, should bear some of the responsibility that goes with helping them survive in the wild.
No comments:
Post a Comment